Skip to content

Page 95 of 141

Search Results

  • Does Corporate Governance Matter?

    There comes a time when corporate governance has little influence over performance, because competitive forces cut away at management fat.

    Learn More »
  • Enabling Bold Visions

    The authors offer a framework that executives can use to ensure that their new visions for their businesses become more than just pipe dreams.

    Learn More »
  • How Companies Become Platform Leaders

    Under the right circumstances, companies of any size can grow to become platform leaders.

    Learn More »
  • How to Increase a Company's Risk Taking

    Do stock options for outside directors encourage bolder decision making? Or could such financial incentives actually inhibit risk taking?

    Learn More »
  • Supply Risk in Fragile Contracts

    Spot markets can be used to limit exposure.

    Learn More »
  • The Benefits of City Locations

    Urban environments can substitute for internal resources in driving process innovation.

    Learn More »
  • Why VIPs Shouldn't Get the Best Tech Support

    Two Unisys studies indicate there's a wiser use of your IT resources.

    Learn More »
  • Avoiding the Alignment Trap in IT

    For many years now, companies seeking to deliver higher business performance by harnessing IT have focused on alignment -- the degree to which the IT group understands the priorities of the business and expends its resources, pursues projects and provides information consistent with them. In practical terms, that means there must be shared ownership and shared governance of IT projects. However, the authors contend that their research -- a survey of more than 500 senior business and technology executives worldwide, followed up with in-depth interviews of 30 CIOs -- reveals a troubling pattern: Even at companies that were focused on alignment, business performance dependent on IT sometimes went sideways, or even declined. That's because underperforming capabilities are often rooted not just in misalignment but in the complexity of systems, applications and other infrastructure. The complexity doesn't magically disappear just because an IT organization learns to focus on aligned projects rather than less aligned ones. On the contrary, the authors say, in some situations it can actually get worse. Costs rise, delays mount and the fragmentation makes it difficult for managers to coordinate across business units. The survey also showed that almost three-quarters of respondents are mired in the "maintenance zone." IT at these companies is generally underperforming, undervalued and kept largely separate from a company's core business functions. Corporate management budgets the amounts necessary to keep the systems running, but IT doesn't offer enough added value to the business and often isn't expected to. Drawing on the experiences of Charles Schwab & Co., Selective Insurance Group, De Beers, First Data Corp. and National City, among others, the authors identify a group of best practices that constitute "IT-enabled growth." The companies that achieve the highest growth at a low cost manage complexity down, source IT staffing and software wherever it makes the most sense and create start-to-finish accountability connected to business results. Then, and only then, the best performers tightly align their entire IT organization to the strategic objectives of the overall business, using governance principles that cross organizational lines and making business executives responsible for key IT initiatives.

    Learn More »
  • Discounting Do's and Don'ts

    Recent evidence shows that some discounts and sales can be detrimental.

    Learn More »
  • Examining Classified Boards

    The expectations aren't being met.

    Learn More »