Strategy

The information age has created a host of digitized products & #8212; in the realms of software, databases, music, videos and electronic books & #8212; for which the potential for piracy, defined as duplication and distribution of a product without the permission of or payment to the content owner, is extremely high. Up to now, efforts to control piracy have been primarily legal in nature, relying upon the assumption that creators of digital products have absolute ownership rights to the content they create. Under the same assumption, companies have also sought to limit piracy with technological safeguards such as click-wrap contracts, encryption, password-limited access to distribution sites and copy proofing. However, say the authors, the belief in absolute ownership of digital content is incorrect from a legal standpoint, and antipiracy tactics that rely upon it will ultimately prove ineffective. What’s more, these tactics may even reduce authorized usage by paying customers. A far better solution, the authors suggest, is to recognize the dynamics of the marketplace, segment that market into innovators (potential pirates) and the mainstream (potential paying customers), and address each segment differently to gather information and establish market leadership. The authors use a variety of cases to illustrate the tactics whereby content creators can coexist with the innovator segment of their audiences while still controlling product price and distribution standards. The key to setting an effective, “priced” value proposition for majority users lies in incorporating the innovator’s technology before it reaches the mainstream. In such a scenario, brand identity encourages the majority to recognize quickly the content provider as the standard source for the product. Brand strength is then enhanced through fair pricing, product enhancement and superior distribution mechanisms.

Platform leadership is the ability of a company to drive innovation around a particular platform technology at the broad industry level.

Farsighted investors can check wayward founder-CEOs by creating strong and independent boards.

What shapes strategy today and how has it changed? While many executives were focused on the implications of the Internet, a more powerful force was at work, contends Stanford University professor Kathleen M. Eisenhardt: globalization. Globalization has quietly transformed the economic playing field. The traditional strategic paradigms (positioning, core competence and the like) are not dead, but they are less germane than they were. Schumpeter’s “creative destruction” and similar economic views are coming into their own. The new economics is more entrepreneurial. It centers on disequilibrium, fleeting opportunities to capture competitive advantage, and the creation and destruction of wealth. Successful strategy in today’s world is simple; it uses a few clear guidelines and allows for flexibility. It is supported by organizational design; it is not handed down from on high. And timing is everything. Eisenhardt cites Colgate’s use of simplicity in a key strategic process, global product management. Colgate has found success through allowing product managers considerable freedom within a couple of simple guidelines (Maintain the Brand; Keep Relative Product Positioning Stable). That thinking also has been a boon to Ispat International, which uses uncomplicated rules for choosing and integrating acquisitions and has thus become one of the world’s fastest-growing steel companies. In contrast, Intel and SAP stumbled with their joint venture for e-commerce services, Pandesic. Although the companies had ample resources and a clear vision of their desired strategic position, their plan’s complexity kept them from adjusting as the market unfolded. Eisenhardt explains how managers can refocus their strategy on key processes and simple rules, mapping their individual businesses to market opportunities and employing an evolutionary form of timing to move from one competitive advantage to the next.

Diversifying can be the best way for companies to match their capabilities to the marketplace.

In following the traditional model of strategy development, a company seeks to craft the best possible plan so that it can be handed off for a predetermined course of execution involving a predictable set of events and a specific final goal. This scripted approach resembles traditional theater: The actors speak the same lines and the action comes to the same satisfying conclusion, night after night. The model works well when business is going through a relatively stable period. The current situation, however, is not stable: Companies are still trying to navigate the technological tsunami created by the Internet. Under the circumstances, it makes much more sense for companies to follow an improvisational model & #8212; that is, to throw out the script, bring in the audience and trust the actors to innovate on the spot. The metaphor of improvisational theater helps executives think about the way in which an entire organization can become an arena for staging experiments that can transform a company’s overarching strategy. Harvard Business School professor Rosabeth Moss Kanter lays out the six elements of strategic improvisation and illustrates how companies have made use of each one to get the most out of new technologies. Senior managers who understand these elements can create an atmosphere in which improvisational theater thrives; change then becomes an organic process rather than a painful reaction to circumstances beyond the company’s control. Although this approach does not advocate a big plunge into something totally new, it is anything but conservative. Companies that engage in continual improvisation through innovative projects of all sizes and shapes are much better equipped to explore highly threatening disruptive technologies and embrace quite radical changes.