Articles

The current economic recession has provided managers with a tempting environment for acquiring "star" employees on the cheap. But the track record of such acquisitions of human capital has been mixed, with many companies failing to integrate their new talent. Apparently, an organization can't just hire star employees and then expect those individuals to automatically shine in their new environment. But how, then, can companies ensure that they get the most out of the talent they hire? The authors have found that, to build a top-notch organization of star employees, companies can't simply hire the best and brightest and then turn those individuals loose into a Darwinian competition. Instead, organizations need to provide and maintain the right environment for those employees to flourish. And that means avoiding a number of common pitfalls, such as falling for the "lone-star myth" (companies often mistakenly believe that one individual can single-handedly turn around an entire department or organization), overestimating the importance of pay (businesses frequently overpay for hiring top talent), allowing stars to go solo (high achievers are over-scheduled almost by definition, so managers should never assume that collaboration will "just happen"), focusing too narrowly on a single department or group (stars need top colleagues throughout the organization in order to do their best work) and neglecting homegrown talent.

Managers need to learn from history about what they can and cannot predict, and develop plans that are sensitive to surprises.

Organizations can pick price points that provide both profits and long-term value to suppliers.

How have strategies for supply chain design changed? Two leading thinkers offer insights.

This article presents frameworks for companies considering a shift to global product development.

The director of MIT's Laboratory for Energy and the Environment considers the decisions companies have to make if they want to be sustainable—and challenges some of the conventional wisdom.

MIT Sloan Management Review's first annual Business of Sustainability survey revealed much about what executives are thinking and doing about sustainability-driven concerns right now--as well as what's impeding their attempts both to capture opportunities and defend against threats. The most widely credited leading thinkers at the sustainability and management intersection, though, wanted to explore something else: the ways that many fundamental management and strategy practices will be transformed by the pressures that sustainability issues are already bringing to bear. This article identifies eight significant ways that current management expectations and practices will be affected by growing societal and economic understanding about sustainability. Among them: how labor productivity can be dramatically increased by sustainably designed workplaces; how companies "bump into" sustainability-related choices, even when they don't look for them; how a company's sustainability profile will become a proxy for the organization's overall management quality; how innovation results are improved by pursuit of sustainability-related outcomes; how sustainability efforts within an organization lead to more productive collaboration across typical organizational silos; and how transparency and trustworthiness will become increasingly consequential to competitive success.

Management is too often idealized as work that should involve detached planning and strategizing.

Many companies have trouble making the transition from a failing business model to one that works. Often, one culprit is an inability to experiment.

While the protection of intellectual property, or IP, seems to be at odds with a company's pursuit of open innovation, or OI--the selective use of research carried out elsewhere--businesses in the know can align these two approaches. An appropriate IP strategy can actually be an enabler of OI activities. In fact, an increasing number of companies, such as International Business Machines Corp., are involved in interconnected "ecosystems"--critically dependent on cooperating with other parties to generate innovations and profits. The authors' research has found that the enabling function of IP depends on the specific circumstances under which companies engage in OI. Two variables in particular have emerged as critical determinants: the technological environment in which the business is active, and the knowledge distribution among potential collaborators. Each variable is presented as having two possible values. The technological environment, for instance, is either calm or turbulent. Concerning the nature of innovative knowledge distribution, external knowledge can be thought of as residing either with the few (in puddles) or with the many (in oceans). By combining these two dimension sets, and thus creating four possible scenarios, we provide a better sense of a firm's most appropriate IP/IO strategy. Depending on the category into which the company falls, IP plays a different role as an enabler of OI.